Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the total score (9.04 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
