Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
