Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
