Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
