Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Delphin FRIZ vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
