Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin SHARX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X
