Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X
