Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanford FA, C2000HGA, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VFC2000HGA
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €184.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000HGA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/195
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-305
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €61.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the total score (8.2 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables