Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/195

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) and the weight (155g / 5,47oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
