Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
85.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.55 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight135g / 4.76oz
Line retireve per crank63 centimeter / 24.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX edges out Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.57 out of 10). Still, Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
