Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
