Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano Vanford FA, C2500SA, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VFC2500SA
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €184.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2500SA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT, 2500 S-XH, left and right hand, Forellen Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10307-201
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €199.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter / 34.25 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables