Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000SDHA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Spinning
37.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag3.0 kg - 6.6 lbs
Weight355 g - 12.5oz
Line retireve per crank86 cm / 33.9 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25-260 / 0.30-180 / 0.35-130 / 0.40-100 lb/yds: 8-240 / 10-200 / 12-160
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX clearly outshines Shimano Super 4000 GT RD, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and weight (185g / 6,53oz). While Shimano Super 4000 GT RD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Shimano Super 4000 GT RD?
Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
