Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 8 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
