Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €184.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanford FA and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX
