Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
88.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (165g / 5,82oz) and the line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Penn Battle III?
Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
