Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 5000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
