Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Delphin INKS 2000X

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Delphin INKS?
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
