Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX clearly outshines Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.49 out of 10). While Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
