Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX edges out Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a weight of 145g / 5,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
