Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (145g / 5,11oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.03 out of 10 (145g / 5,11oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
