Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74cm / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
