Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight145g / 5.11oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (145g / 5,11oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.03 out of 10 (145g / 5,11oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
