Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
86.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2500SC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX clearly outshines Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.63 out of 10). While Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag?
Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
