Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX offers a weight of 170g / 6oz, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
