Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX
