Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:8) and the weight (170g / 6oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:8), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
