Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.7:1). Still, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
