Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Both Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX and Daiwa Tanacom 750 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa Tanacom 750 stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
