Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
57.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €33.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/215
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
