Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (170g / 6oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
