Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX edges out Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.41 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Vanquish FC and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
