Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Both Cormoran Sportline 2PiF and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Cormoran Sportline 2PiF offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
