Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05 lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05 lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
