Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
