Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
