Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
