Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
