Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
