Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and total score (8.55 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
