Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
