Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X
