Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
