Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN?
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
