Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa BG 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa BG
Spinning
69.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.79 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €108.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa BG 4000X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa BG 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa BG?
Daiwa BG 4000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
