Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
