Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- With a top weight score of 9.23 out of 10 (230g / 8.11oz), this reel keeps your setup light and responsive
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- For 8 out of 10 (22,6kg / 49,82lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
