Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano FX
Spinning
49.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 4000 FCX and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 4000 FCX offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano FX?
Shimano FX 4000 FCX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
