Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and gear ratio. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- Solid value at €88.60, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
