Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 DH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and gear ratio (5.0:1). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
